FrederikBaerentsen/BrickTracker
8
20
Fork 12
Code Issues 11 Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects 1 Releases 9 Wiki Activity

[Feature] Checklist Mode for Inventory Parts #70

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-03-09 00:26:02 +01:00 by bitkraken · 11 comments
bitkraken commented 2025-03-09 00:26:02 +01:00
Copy Link
Copy Source

I'm very often using the "Checklist Mode" on Rebrickable to keep track of my progress while searching all parts for a set. It's very useful, when your kids messed up and "stored" the set inside the box full of loose parts, so basically all parts are missing :)
(Sadly Rebrickable is only storing these only for the current session, after a refresh of the page, the information is gone. Also the page gets really laggy while using it.)

Would be awesome to have this feature in BrickTracker too, just with persisting the information on the server.

Feature could include the following:

  • A Checkbox for each Inventory Part Entry (stored as Boolean inside the DB)
  • A toggle to clear all checkboxes at once (when you need to re-check the set)
I'm very often using the "Checklist Mode" on Rebrickable to keep track of my progress while searching all parts for a set. It's very useful, when your kids messed up and "stored" the set inside the box full of loose parts, so basically _all_ parts are missing :) _(Sadly Rebrickable is only storing these only for the current session, after a refresh of the page, the information is gone. Also the page gets really laggy while using it.)_ Would be awesome to have this feature in BrickTracker too, just with persisting the information on the server. Feature could include the following: - [ ] A Checkbox for each Inventory Part Entry (stored as Boolean inside the DB) - [ ] A toggle to clear all checkboxes at once (when you need to re-check the set)
deadbattery commented 2025-04-09 04:59:00 +02:00
Copy Link
Copy Source

I would love this feature.

I would love this feature.
RegShoe commented 2025-08-27 05:07:43 +02:00
Copy Link
Copy Source

This could be implemented as a small hamburger menu:

"Mark all as missing": sets the missing quantity to the quantity for each part in the set
"Clear all missing":

Then as items are found, the existing clear button can be used.

This could be implemented as a small hamburger menu: > "Mark all as missing": sets the missing quantity to the quantity for each part in the set > "Clear all missing": Then as items are found, the existing clear button can be used.
image.png
36 KiB
image.png
FrederikBaerentsen added the Kind/Enhancement label 2025-09-14 11:42:43 +02:00
FrederikBaerentsen commented 2025-09-14 13:49:36 +02:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@bitkraken @deadbattery @RegShoe

Something like this? The formatting will be fixed though, just needed a proof-of-concept with a working backend.

The dropdown will mark all parts as missing or clear all parts from being missing. It has does not clear or touch the checkmarks. Is this the wanted functionality?

@bitkraken @deadbattery @RegShoe Something like this? The formatting will be fixed though, just needed a proof-of-concept with a working backend. The dropdown will mark all parts as missing or clear all parts from being missing. It has does not clear or touch the checkmarks. Is this the wanted functionality?
checkmarks.PNG
25 KiB
checkmarks.PNG
FrederikBaerentsen self-assigned this 2025-09-14 18:51:55 +02:00
FrederikBaerentsen added this to the General Improvements project 2025-09-15 20:43:57 +02:00
FrederikBaerentsen added the
Priority
Low
 label 2025-09-15 20:44:04 +02:00
FrederikBaerentsen moved this to In Progress in General Improvements on 2025-09-15 20:44:23 +02:00
RegShoe commented 2025-09-16 10:47:05 +02:00
Copy Link
Copy Source

My thought was to save some work and not implement the checkbox but instead use the existing "missing" field.
However, if the checkboxes are there, it makes sense to me to have "select all" and "clear all" options as well as the implemented "Mark all as missing" and "Clear all missing" in the hamburger menu.

My thought was to save some work and not implement the checkbox but instead use the existing "missing" field. However, if the checkboxes are there, it makes sense to me to have "select all" and "clear all" options as well as the implemented "Mark all as missing" and "Clear all missing" in the hamburger menu.
FrederikBaerentsen commented 2025-09-16 10:57:23 +02:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Okay so there should be:

  1. Column with checkboxes (marks are saved between sessions)
  2. Hamburger menu with:
    a. Mark all parts as missing
    b. Clear all parts as missing
    c. Check all checkboxes
    d. Clear all checkboxes

If i understand, it is kind of two different features (checkboxes and marking all parts as missing), but it could be fixed using a single hamburger menu?

Okay so there should be: 1. Column with checkboxes (marks are saved between sessions) 2. Hamburger menu with: a. Mark all parts as missing b. Clear all parts as missing c. Check all checkboxes d. Clear all checkboxes If i understand, it is kind of two different features (checkboxes and marking all parts as missing), but it could be fixed using a single hamburger menu?
👍 1
RegShoe commented 2025-09-16 11:02:51 +02:00
Copy Link
Copy Source

That’s my understanding. You could add an environmental variable to hide checkboxes if some users didn’t want to see them

That’s my understanding. You could add an environmental variable to hide checkboxes if some users didn’t want to see them
FrederikBaerentsen added
Priority
Medium
 and removed
Priority
Low
 labels 2025-09-16 11:33:22 +02:00
bitkraken commented 2025-09-16 12:06:28 +02:00
Author
Copy Link
Copy Source

@FrederikBaerentsen Looking awesome. Thanks for your work!

@FrederikBaerentsen Looking awesome. Thanks for your work!
FrederikBaerentsen added this to the Version 1.3 milestone 2025-09-22 08:37:21 +02:00
FrederikBaerentsen changed title from Checklist Mode for Inventory Parts to [Feature] Checklist Mode for Inventory Parts 2025-09-22 08:52:09 +02:00
FrederikBaerentsen moved this to To Do in General Improvements on 2025-09-24 22:06:17 +02:00
FrederikBaerentsen moved this to In Progress in General Improvements on 2025-09-26 11:50:25 +02:00
FrederikBaerentsen commented 2025-09-26 11:54:02 +02:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@bitkraken @RegShoe @deadbattery This feature is available for testing on the :checkbox branch. Please let me know how it works for you.

New env vars are:

# Optional: Hide the 'Checked' column from the parts table.
# Default: false
# BK_HIDE_TABLE_CHECKED_PARTS=true

If both BK_HIDE_TABLE_MISSING_PARTS and BK_HIDE_TABLE_CHECKED_PARTS are true the hamburger-menu is hidden, as it wont do anything.

The menu does not contain a mark all parts as damaged, since i can't see how that would ever be a case.

EDIT: Make a backup of your db, as we need to upgrade to v18 for the new checkmark column

@bitkraken @RegShoe @deadbattery This feature is available for testing on the `:checkbox` branch. Please let me know how it works for you. New env vars are: ``` # Optional: Hide the 'Checked' column from the parts table. # Default: false # BK_HIDE_TABLE_CHECKED_PARTS=true ``` If both `BK_HIDE_TABLE_MISSING_PARTS` and `BK_HIDE_TABLE_CHECKED_PARTS` are `true` the hamburger-menu is hidden, as it wont do anything. The menu does not contain a mark all parts as damaged, since i can't see how that would ever be a case. EDIT: Make a backup of your db, as we need to upgrade to v18 for the new checkmark column
FrederikBaerentsen moved this to Needs testing in General Improvements on 2025-09-27 15:06:43 +02:00
FrederikBaerentsen moved this to Done in General Improvements on 2025-09-27 16:26:27 +02:00
FrederikBaerentsen commented 2025-09-27 16:29:37 +02:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Implemented. Will be released with version 1.3.0. Testing on :checkbox

Implemented. Will be released with version 1.3.0. Testing on `:checkbox`
❤️ 1
deadbattery commented 2025-09-30 00:55:35 +02:00
Copy Link
Copy Source

Works great!

Works great!
bitkraken commented 2026-02-15 18:21:35 +01:00
Author
Copy Link
Copy Source

I'm so sorry for my very late response! but THANK YOU SO MUCH! I was scraping together some 1000+ sets from a big box of mixed LEGO and this new feature made this so much more enjoyable :)

I'm so sorry for my very late response! but THANK YOU SO MUCH! I was scraping together some 1000+ sets from a big box of mixed LEGO and this new feature made this so much more enjoyable :)
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
Compat/Breaking
Breaking change that won't be backward compatible
 Kind/Bug
Something is not working
 Kind/Documentation
Documentation changes
 Kind/Enhancement
Improve existing functionality
 Kind/Feature
New functionality
 Kind/Security
This is security issue
 Kind/Testing
Issue or pull request related to testing
 Out of Scope
Request is out of scope
Priority
Critical
The priority is critical
Priority
High
The priority is high
Priority
Low
The priority is low
Priority
Medium
The priority is medium
Reviewed
Confirmed
Issue has been confirmed
Reviewed
Duplicate
This issue or pull request already exists
Reviewed
Invalid
Invalid issue
Reviewed
Won't Fix
This issue won't be fixed
Status
Abandoned
Somebody has started to work on this but abandoned work
Status
Blocked
Something is blocking this issue or pull request
Status
Need More Info
Feedback is required to reproduce issue or to continue work
Unraid
Unsupported/Can't help
No Label Kind/Enhancement
Priority
Medium
Milestone
No items
No Milestone Version 1.3
Projects
Clear projects
No project General Improvements
Assignees
Clear assignees
FrederikBaerentsen
No Assignees FrederikBaerentsen
4 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: FrederikBaerentsen/BrickTracker#70
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?