Custom checkboxes for sets (and visibility on the grid) #48

Closed
opened 2025-01-23 13:25:53 +01:00 by gregoo · 5 comments
Collaborator

Users should be able to reword, remove, or add any checkbox to signify a status for a set.
It should also be possible to tell whether the field is displayed on the grid view, or only when show the details of a set.
It also introduces automatic entries in the filters with its inverse lookup (NOT: )

These are mockups, I'm only missing the management part (creating, updating and deleting a field).

image
image
image

And with some new fields and changed options:

image
image
image

(Don't worry about the missing background blur, Firefox capture tool somehow discards it 🤷‍♂️)

Users should be able to reword, remove, or add any checkbox to signify a status for a set. It should also be possible to tell whether the field is displayed on the grid view, or only when show the details of a set. It also introduces automatic entries in the filters with its inverse lookup (`NOT: `) These are mockups, I'm only missing the management part (creating, updating and deleting a field). ![image](/attachments/fa4d483e-4854-4a51-b7f0-3544090dc41c) ![image](/attachments/f273d2b8-dc5f-40f4-9c92-ceb09f8e5a9d) ![image](/attachments/624b3829-e590-4d0c-9fc9-5dbd7ffbe95a) And with some new fields and changed options: ![image](/attachments/3591381e-43d4-4534-a649-0345320e0828) ![image](/attachments/f0df1efb-88b0-4679-8e16-6fb736d79baf) ![image](/attachments/1f26200f-d73c-496b-ad8b-f032830b1c96) (Don't worry about the missing background blur, Firefox capture tool somehow discards it 🤷‍♂️)
Author
Collaborator

Management form reworked without the ID (which should be handled internally) and some glow up. Also a line to add a new checkbox.

image

Management form reworked without the ID (which should be handled internally) and some glow up. Also a line to add a new checkbox. ![image](/attachments/2e4d5e40-b923-4a51-8789-6016d1738f74)

Good idea. I was just thinking about the labels the other day and how they probably needed to be customized.

Good idea. I was just thinking about the labels the other day and how they probably needed to be customized.
Author
Collaborator

I have it working alongside deduplicating the bricksets, database migrations and some quality of life in the code.
I'll update my merge request in the next days hopefuly after finishing a few things and documenting.
It's going to be a bit heavy but it will pave the way for the rest of the things I am missing (like the box and owners 😁)

I have it working alongside deduplicating the bricksets, database migrations and some quality of life in the code. I'll update my merge request in the next days hopefuly after finishing a few things and documenting. It's going to be a bit heavy but it will pave the way for the rest of the things I am missing (like the box and owners 😁)
Author
Collaborator

Implemented in 623b205733

Implemented in 623b205733d786f32fd77999524364a646d58e2d

Closed as it's live in v1.1.0

Closed as it's live in v1.1.0
Sign in to join this conversation.
No description provided.