FrederikBaerentsen/BrickTracker
4
6
Fork 6
Code Issues 13 Pull Requests 2 Actions Packages Projects 1 Releases 4 Wiki Activity

Custom checkboxes for sets (and visibility on the grid) #48

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-01-23 13:25:53 +01:00 by gregoo · 5 comments
gregoo commented 2025-01-23 13:25:53 +01:00
Collaborator
Copy Link

Users should be able to reword, remove, or add any checkbox to signify a status for a set.
It should also be possible to tell whether the field is displayed on the grid view, or only when show the details of a set.
It also introduces automatic entries in the filters with its inverse lookup (NOT: )

These are mockups, I'm only missing the management part (creating, updating and deleting a field).

image
image
image

And with some new fields and changed options:

image
image
image

(Don't worry about the missing background blur, Firefox capture tool somehow discards it 🤷‍♂️)

Users should be able to reword, remove, or add any checkbox to signify a status for a set. It should also be possible to tell whether the field is displayed on the grid view, or only when show the details of a set. It also introduces automatic entries in the filters with its inverse lookup (`NOT: `) These are mockups, I'm only missing the management part (creating, updating and deleting a field). ![image](/attachments/fa4d483e-4854-4a51-b7f0-3544090dc41c) ![image](/attachments/f273d2b8-dc5f-40f4-9c92-ceb09f8e5a9d) ![image](/attachments/624b3829-e590-4d0c-9fc9-5dbd7ffbe95a) And with some new fields and changed options: ![image](/attachments/3591381e-43d4-4534-a649-0345320e0828) ![image](/attachments/f0df1efb-88b0-4679-8e16-6fb736d79baf) ![image](/attachments/1f26200f-d73c-496b-ad8b-f032830b1c96) (Don't worry about the missing background blur, Firefox capture tool somehow discards it 🤷‍♂️)
image.png
116 KiB
image.png
140 KiB
image.png
139 KiB
image.png
592 KiB
image.png
940 KiB
image.png
555 KiB
gregoo commented 2025-01-23 13:34:35 +01:00
Author
Collaborator
Copy Link

Management form reworked without the ID (which should be handled internally) and some glow up. Also a line to add a new checkbox.

image

Management form reworked without the ID (which should be handled internally) and some glow up. Also a line to add a new checkbox. ![image](/attachments/2e4d5e40-b923-4a51-8789-6016d1738f74)
image.png
78 KiB
FrederikBaerentsen commented 2025-01-23 14:09:52 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Good idea. I was just thinking about the labels the other day and how they probably needed to be customized.

Good idea. I was just thinking about the labels the other day and how they probably needed to be customized.
gregoo commented 2025-01-23 17:54:49 +01:00
Author
Collaborator
Copy Link

I have it working alongside deduplicating the bricksets, database migrations and some quality of life in the code.
I'll update my merge request in the next days hopefuly after finishing a few things and documenting.
It's going to be a bit heavy but it will pave the way for the rest of the things I am missing (like the box and owners 😁)

I have it working alongside deduplicating the bricksets, database migrations and some quality of life in the code. I'll update my merge request in the next days hopefuly after finishing a few things and documenting. It's going to be a bit heavy but it will pave the way for the rest of the things I am missing (like the box and owners 😁)
gregoo commented 2025-01-24 16:02:55 +01:00
Author
Collaborator
Copy Link

Implemented in 623b205733

Implemented in 623b205733d786f32fd77999524364a646d58e2d
FrederikBaerentsen commented 2025-01-24 21:29:17 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Closed as it's live in v1.1.0

Closed as it's live in v1.1.0
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels   
Compat/Breaking

Breaking change that won't be backward compatible

  
Kind/Bug

Something is not working

  
Kind/Documentation

Documentation changes

  
Kind/Enhancement

Improve existing functionality

  
Kind/Feature

New functionality

  
Kind/Security

This is security issue

  
Kind/Testing

Issue or pull request related to testing

  
Priority
Critical
The priority is critical

  
Priority
High
The priority is high

  
Priority
Low
The priority is low

  
Priority
Medium
The priority is medium

  
Reviewed
Confirmed
Issue has been confirmed

  
Reviewed
Duplicate
This issue or pull request already exists

  
Reviewed
Invalid
Invalid issue

  
Reviewed
Won't Fix
This issue won't be fixed

  
Status
Abandoned
Somebody has started to work on this but abandoned work

  
Status
Blocked
Something is blocking this issue or pull request

  
Status
Need More Info
Feedback is required to reproduce issue or to continue work

  
Unraid

Unsupported/Can't help

No Label
Compat/Breaking
Kind/Bug
Kind/Documentation
Kind/Enhancement
Kind/Feature
Kind/Security
Kind/Testing
Priority
Critical
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Medium
Reviewed
Confirmed
Reviewed
Duplicate
Reviewed
Invalid
Reviewed
Won't Fix
Status
Abandoned
Status
Blocked
Status
Need More Info
Unraid
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No Assignees
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: FrederikBaerentsen/BrickTracker#48
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?